type="text/css" />

A New Stride Towards Quantum Computing

Posted by Science Oxford on February 17, 2010 | comments

This is amazing stuff.

Re­search­ers are re­port­ing that they have passed a ma­jor hur­dle in the quest to cre­ate a radic­ally new kind of com­put­er, the quan­tum com­put­er.

Quan­tum com­put­ers would ex­ploit the some­times ap­par­ently non­sen­si­cal laws of quan­tum phys­ics, or na­ture at the sub­a­tom­ic scale, to achieve un­prec­e­dent­ed pow­er and speed.

A ma­jor chal­lenge been find­ing a way to ma­ni­pu­late in­di­vid­ual elec­trons, elec­tric­ally charged com­po­nents of atoms. Elec­trons are seen as the most likely can­di­dates to con­sti­tute the new machi­nes’ pro­cess­ing com­po­nents, or “qu­bits.”

Prince­ton phys­i­cist Ja­son Pet­ta said he and some col­leagues have dem­on­strat­ed a meth­od that al­ters the prop­er­ties of a lone elec­tron with­out dis­turb­ing the tril­lions of elec­trons in its im­me­di­ate sur­round­ings. The feat is con­sid­ered es­sen­tial to the de­vel­op­ment of quan­tum com­put­ers.

Petta has fash­ioned a new meth­od of trap­ping one or two elec­trons in mi­cro­scop­ic cor­rals cre­ated by ap­ply­ing to mi­nus­cule elec­trodes volt­ages, or elec­tric fields that move elec­trons. Writ­ing in the Feb. 5 edi­tion of the re­search jour­nal Sci­ence, Pet­ta and col­leagues de­scribe how elec­trons trapped in these cor­rals form “spin qu­bits,” quan­tum ver­sions of clas­sic com­put­er in­forma­t­ion un­its known as bits.

Pre­vi­ous ex­pe­ri­ments used a tech­nique in which elec­trons were ex­posed to mi­cro­wave radia­t­ion. How­ev­er, be­cause it af­fect­ed all the elec­trons un­iformly, the tech­nique could not be used to ma­ni­pu­late sin­gle elec­trons in spin qu­bits. It al­so was slow. Pet­ta’s meth­od not only achieves con­trol of sin­gle elec­trons, but it does so ex­tremely rap­id­ly, he said—in a bil­lionth of a sec­ond.

Sub­a­tom­ic par­t­i­cles are found to fol­low the laws of quan­tum phys­ics—in which, for ex­am­ple, they can be in two places at once—as long as these par­t­i­cles stay alone or in very small groups. When they come into con­tact with a great­er mass, the quan­tum ef­fects norm­ally ap­pear to van­ish.

“If you can take a small enough ob­ject like a sin­gle elec­tron and iso­late it well enough from ex­ter­nal per­turba­t­ions, then it will be­have quan­tum me­chan­ic­ally for a long pe­ri­od of time,” said Pet­ta. “All we want is for the elec­tron to just sit there and do what we tell it to do. But the out­side world is sort of pok­ing at it, and that pro­cess of the out­side world pok­ing at it causes it to lose its quan­tum me­chan­ical na­ture.”

When the elec­trons in Pet­ta’s ex­pe­ri­ment are in what he calls their quan­tum state, they are “co­her­en­t,” fol­lowing rules that are radic­ally dif­fer­ent from the world seen by the na­ked eye. Liv­ing for frac­tions of a sec­ond in the realm of quan­tum phys­ics be­fore they are rat­tled by ex­ter­nal forc­es, the elec­trons obey a un­ique set of phys­i­cal laws that gov­ern the be­hav­ior of ultra-small ob­jects. Quan­tum com­put­ers would be de­signed to take ad­van­tage of these char­ac­ter­is­tics.

In ad­di­tion to elec­trical charge, elec­trons pos­sess some­thing akin to rota­t­ion. In the quan­tum world, ob­jects can turn in ways that are at odds with com­mon ex­perience. The Aus­tri­an the­o­ret­i­cal phys­i­cist Wolf­gang Pau­li, who won the No­bel Prize in Phys­ics in 1945, pro­posed that an elec­tron in a quan­tum state can as­sume one of two states, “spin-up” or “spin-down.” It can be im­ag­ined as be­hav­ing like a ti­ny ba­r mag­net with spin-up cor­re­spond­ing to the north pole point­ing up and spin-down cor­re­spond­ing to the north pole point­ing down.

An elec­tron in a quan­tum state can sim­ul­ta­ne­ous­ly be par­tially in the spin-up state and par­tially in the spin-down state or any­where in be­tween, a quan­tum me­chan­ical prop­er­ty called “su­per­po­si­tion of states.” A qu­bit based on the spin of an elec­tron could have nearly lim­it­less po­ten­tial be­cause it can be nei­ther strictly on nor strictly off.

New de­signs could take ad­van­tage of a rich set of pos­si­bil­i­ties of­fered by har­ness­ing this prop­er­ty to en­hance com­put­ing pow­er. In the past dec­ade, the­o­rists and math­e­mati­cians have de­signed for­mu­las that ex­ploit this mys­te­ri­ous su­per­po­si­tion to per­form in­tri­cate cal­cula­t­ions at speeds un­matched by supercom­put­ers to­day.

Pet­ta’s work is aimed at ex­ploiting elec­tron spin.

“In the quest to build a quan­tum com­put­er with elec­tron spin qu­bits, nu­clear spins are typ­ic­ally a nui­sance,” said Gui­do Burk­ard, a the­o­ret­i­cal phys­i­cist at the Uni­vers­ity of Kon­stanz in Germany. “Petta and cowork­ers dem­on­strate a new meth­od that uti­lizes the nu­clear spins for per­forming fast quan­tum opera­t­ions. For sol­id-state quan­tum com­put­ing, their re­sult is a big step for­ward.”

Pet­ta’s spin qubits, which he en­vi­sions as the co­re of fu­ture quan­tum log­ic el­e­ments, are cooled to ultra-cold tem­per­a­tures and trapped in two ti­ny cor­rals known as quan­tum wells on the sur­face of a chip made of high-pur­ity gal­li­um ar­se­nide. The depth of each well is con­trolled by var­y­ing the volt­age on ti­ny elec­trodes or gates. Like a jug­gler toss­ing two balls be­tween his hands, Petta can move the elec­trons from one well to the oth­er by se­lec­tively switch­ing the gate volt­ages.

Be­fore this ex­pe­ri­ment, it was­n’t clear how ex­pe­ri­menters could ma­ni­pu­late the spin of one elec­tron with­out dis­turb­ing the spin of anoth­er in a closely packed space, ac­cord­ing to phys­i­cist Phuan Ong, di­rec­tor of the Prince­ton Cen­ter for Com­plex Ma­te­ri­als.

Pet­ta’s re­search al­so is part of the fledg­ling field of “spin­tron­ics” in which sci­en­tists are stu­dy­ing how to use an elec­tron’s spin to cre­ate new types of elec­tronic de­vices. Most elec­trical de­vices to­day op­er­ate on the ba­sis of anoth­er key prop­er­ty of the elec­tron, its charge.

There are many more chal­lenges to face, Pet­ta said. “Our ap­proach is really to look at the build­ing blocks of the sys­tem, to think deeply about what the lim­ita­t­ions are and what we can do to over­come them,” he added. “But we are still at the lev­el of just ma­ni­pu­lat­ing one or two quan­tum bits, and you really need hun­dreds to do some­thing use­ful.” As ex­cit­ed as he is about pre­s­ent prog­ress, long-term ap­plica­t­ions are still years away, he added; “it’s a one-day-at-a-time ap­proach.”

Visit this page »

What do you think?


RSS feed Twitter feed Newsletter