A Road Map for Greener Transport?
Posted by Science Oxford on January 20, 2010 | comments
New research says a good way to reduces car emissions in the short term is a huge reduction in the size and weight of vehicles. This doesn’t strike me as a brilliant idea but read on to find out more, and let us know what you think?
Visit this page »An Oxford University study says the best way to reduce emissions in the short term is a ‘drastic downscaling of both size and weight’ of conventional petrol and diesel cars.
The research by Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment suggests that we should not rely on manufacturers producing hydrogen or battery-powered vehicles in the next decade.
The report ‘Future of Mobility Roadmap’ assesses the potential for low carbon transport on land, by air and sea. It finds that electric and hydrogen vehicles are likely to remain niche products for many years because of limited battery life and the high cost of platinum, which is needed for the catalysts in hydrogen fuelled cars.
The study editor Sir David King and lead author Dr Oliver Inderwildi urge the government to impose higher taxes on drivers of large, inefficient vehicles and reinvest the money in better public transport and measures to get more people cycling and walking.
Dr Inderwildi says: ‘There is ample opportunity for emissions reductions by further improvements of currently available technology combined with a change in user habits.’
Rather than rely on the manufacturers to provide the ‘silver bullet’ solution to cut transport emissions, the report recommends behavioural change, urging consumers to influence manufacturers through their buying power. Manufacturers are more likely to produce smaller vehicles if customers opt not to buy larger, heavier vehicles with higher carbon emissions.
Better technology could significantly cut emissions from aircraft and shipping but incentives and regulation will be needed to encourage users to switch to low-carbon forms of transport, says the report.
It highlights algae-based biofuels as a means of significantly cutting transport emissions in the future and points out the limitations of biofuels as an alternative because of land shortages and food security concerns. First generation biofuels, derived from food stocks, ‘have proved the viability of such fuels, but remain a local solution, as in Brazil,’ it says.
Dr Inderwildi sees electric and diesel rail systems as the way forward in bringing down transport emissions but says there are disadvantages in the resulting infrastructure costs and lack of flexibility in route planning. Even so, reducing the carbon footprint of cars and replacing domestic flights with high speed rail could still produce ‘drastic emissions savings’.
The study warns that action must be taken immediately to have any impact on climate change because of the long lifetime of transport fleets and subsequent delays in technological impact.
‘Many technological options are already available and, in combination with infrastructure investments, [will] support the economy, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and provide other long-term benefits,’ says the report.
21
Jan
Incentives would certainly be a key factor, and they would have to be available both to manufacturers and the public (drivers.) The array of opposition to lighter (and therefore more dangerous?) vehicles would include special interest lobbyists who would fight legislation, manufacturers, until incentives outweighed costs, and possibly those who feared decreased safety factors in cars made of lighter materials. This would be a multi-decade effort.
11
Aug
WhY would it not be a brilliant idea? Of course it would be better. Large vehichles are not only obscene and completely unnecessary, but detrimental to the enviroment and a safety hazard for people. They kill people, it’s why they have to keep reducing speed limits in residential areas.
Lighter cars hazardous? How so? Big cars kill people. Just look to America. (I’ve lived there, nightmare) It has also been proven that the bigger and heavier they get, the more road rage and violence we get. People actually admit to wanting to run people over and kill them.
Yes, by all means, make them all smaller and lighter. It should be mandatory.