type="text/css" />

Exotic Antimatter Finding May Clarify Cosmic Symmetries

Posted by Science Oxford on March 17, 2010 | comments

Scientists say they have now detected the heaviest “anti-nucleus” to date. Read on to find out more:

Phys­i­cists say they have de­tected the heav­i­est “an­ti-nu­cle­us” to date, a rare spec­i­men of a sort of mirror-image form of or­di­nary mat­ter.

The find­ing may shed light on cos­mic sym­me­tries, and asym­me­tries, that ex­plain why most of the an­ti­mat­ter orig­i­nally pro­duced at the birth of the uni­verse is gone, ac­cord­ing to sci­en­tists.

An an­ti­par­t­i­cle is a var­i­ant of one of the nor­mal build­ing blocks of mat­ter that has equal weight, but is op­po­site in elec­tri­cal charge and cer­tain oth­er re­spects, to its “nor­mal” par­t­i­cle coun­ter­part. As a nu­cle­us is the co­re of an or­di­nary at­om, an an­ti-nu­cle­us is the co­re of an “an­ti-at­om.”

The new­found an­ti-nu­cle­us al­so con­tains the first ex­am­ple of a smaller, equally ex­ot­ic com­po­nent build­ing block that phys­i­cists call an an­ti-strange quark.

The dis­cov­ery “may have un­prec­e­dent­ed con­se­quenc­es for our view of the world,” said the­o­ret­i­cal phys­i­cist Horst Stoe­cker, Vi­ce Pres­ident of the Helm­holtz As­socia­t­ion of Ger­man Na­tional Lab­o­r­a­to­ries. “This an­ti­mat­ter pushes open the door to new di­men­sions in the nu­clear chart — an idea that just a few years ago, would have been viewed as im­pos­si­ble.”

The find­ing, at the U.S. De­part­ment of En­er­gy’s Brook­ha­ven Na­tional Lab­o­r­a­to­ry in New York, may al­so help shed light on the work­ings of com­pact ce­les­tial ob­jects known as neu­tron stars, re­search­ers said.

The nu­cle­us of a nor­mal at­om on Earth con­sists of build­ing blocks called pro­tons and neu­trons, which in turn con­tain smaller com­po­nents known as quarks. These quarks ap­pear in two types, ar­bi­trarily called “up” and “down” va­ri­eties.

The stand­ard Per­i­od­ic Ta­ble of El­e­ments is a grid ar­ranged by num­ber of pro­tons, which de­ter­mine each chem­i­cal el­e­men­t’s prop­er­ties in its bas­ic in­ter­ac­tions with oth­er el­e­ments.

But phys­i­cists al­so use a more com­plex, three-di­men­sion­ chart which adds in­forma­t­ion on the dif­fer­ing num­ber of neu­trons that can oc­cur in sam­ples of each el­e­ment. The 3-D chart al­so in­di­cates a num­ber known as “s­trangeness,” which de­pends on the pres­ence of so-called “s­trange” quarks. Nu­clei con­taining one or more strange quarks are called hy­per­nu­clei.

For or­di­nary mat­ter with­out strange quarks, the strange­ness val­ue is ze­ro and the chart is flat. Hy­per­nu­clei are charted on a sep­a­rate grid, which is shown as if hov­er­ing above the stand­ard ta­ble. The new dis­cov­ery of strange an­ti­mat­ter with an an­ti­strange quark—an “an­ti­hy­per­nu­cle­us”—marks the first en­try be­low the stand­ard grid, sci­en­tists ex­plain.

The bi­zarre par­t­i­cle was de­tected as a re­sult of high-speed col­li­sions of gold nu­clei at the Rel­a­tiv­is­t Heavy Ion Col­lider, the Brook­ha­ven lab­o­r­a­to­ry’s at­om smash­er. The re­sults were pub­lished March 4 on the on­line edi­tion of the re­search jour­nal Sci­ence.

The study of the new an­ti­hyp­er­nu­cle­us al­so yields a val­u­a­ble sam­ple of hy­per­nu­clei, and has im­plica­t­ions for our un­der­stand­ing of the struc­ture of col­lapsed stars, called neu­tron stars, re­search­ers said. “The strange­ness val­ue could be non-ze­ro in the co­re of col­lapsed stars,” said Jin­hui Chen, one of the lead au­thors, of the Shang­hai In­sti­tute of Ap­plied Phys­ics and a post­doc­tor­al re­searcher at Kent State Uni­vers­ity in Ohio. The new mea­sure­ments “will help us dis­tin­guish be­tween mod­els that de­scribe these ex­ot­ic states of mat­ter.”

The find­ings al­so pave the way for ex­plor­ing vi­ola­t­ions of fun­da­men­tal sym­me­tries be­tween mat­ter and an­ti­mat­ter that oc­curred in the early uni­verse, mak­ing pos­si­ble the very ex­ist­ence of our world, phys­i­cists added.

Smashups be­tween at­omic nu­clei at the col­lider are be­lieved to fleet­ingly re­pro­duce con­di­tions that ex­isted a mi­nus­cule frac­tion of a sec­ond af­ter the Big Bang, which sci­en­tists be­lieve gave birth to the uni­verse as we know it some 13.7 bil­lion years ago.

In both events, quarks and an­ti­quarks emerge with equal abun­dance, ac­cord­ing to phys­i­cists. At the lab­o­r­a­to­ry, among the col­li­sion frag­ments that sur­vive to the fi­nal state, mat­ter and an­ti­mat­ter are still meas­ured as close to equally abun­dant. In con­trast, an­ti­mat­ter ap­pears to be largely ab­sent from the pre­s­ent-day uni­verse.

“Under­stand­ing pre­cisely how and why there’s a pre­dom­i­nance of mat­ter over an­ti­mat­ter re­mains a ma­jor un­solved prob­lem of physics,” said Brook­ha­ven phys­i­cist Zhang­bu Xu, anoth­er one of the lead au­thors. “A so­lu­tion will re­quire mea­sure­ments of sub­tle de­via­t­ions from per­fect sym­me­try be­tween mat­ter and an­ti­mat­ter, and there are good prospects for fu­ture an­ti­mat­ter mea­sure­ments at RHIC [Rel­a­tiv­is­t Heavy Ion Col­lider] to ad­dress this key is­sue.”

In a sin­gle col­li­sion of gold nu­clei at the col­lider, many hun­dreds of par­t­i­cles burst out at the point of the crash. Most of these don’t ac­tu­ally come from the pre­vi­ously ex­ist­ing, col­lid­ing ob­jects as such. Rath­er, they are formed from the en­er­gy of the col­li­sion, by the con­ver­sion of en­er­gy in­to mass in ac­cord­ance with Ein­stein’s fa­mous equa­t­ion E = mc2.

The par­t­i­cles leave tell­tale tracks in a de­tec­tor hooked up to the col­lider, called the STAR de­tec­tor. Sci­en­tists an­a­lyzed about a hun­dred mil­lion col­li­sions to spot the new an­ti­nu­clei, which aren’t di­rectly detecta­ble them­selves but are iden­ti­fa­ble through the byprod­ucts in­to which they dis­in­te­grate. Al­to­geth­er, 70 spec­i­mens of the new an­ti­nu­cle­us were de­tected.

STAR de­tec­tor sci­en­tists, who come from 54 in­sti­tu­tions in 13 coun­tries, say they should be able to disco­ver even heav­i­er an­ti­nu­clei soon. The­o­ret­i­cal phys­i­cist Stoe­cker and his team have pre­dicted that strange nu­clei around dou­ble the mass of the newly disco­vered state should be par­tic­u­larly sta­ble.

Visit this page »

What do you think?


RSS feed Twitter feed Newsletter