type="text/css" />

Tattoos and Piercings May Advertise Good Health

Posted by Science Oxford on December 27, 2009 | comments

This is interesting, so it may be the case that we are not too far removed from our animal counterparts!

Tat­toos and body pierc­ings—com­mon world­wide since an­cient times—may ex­ist be­cause they ef­fec­tively ad­ver­tise ro­bust health and good genes to po­ten­tial mates, a study pro­poses.

Bi­ol­o­gists the­o­rize that many risky, costly and ap­par­ently use­less be­hav­iors per­sist am­ong ani­mals be­cause of what they com­mu­ni­cate to po­ten­tial mates, ri­vals and oth­ers. For ex­am­ple, an ex­pen­sive Rolex watch may be no more use­ful or pret­ti­er than a Timex, but for some peo­ple it serves a func­tion by cre­at­ing an au­ra of wealth.

A field of ev­o­lu­tion­ary bi­ol­o­gy called sig­nal­ing the­o­ry ex­am­ines such be­hav­iors.

“Hon­est sig­nals” are de­fined as sig­nals that are hard to fake and thus make bet­ter ad­ver­tisements. For in­stance, the Rolex may not show true fi­nan­cial sol­id­ity; you might have just over­drawn your cred­it card or be run­ning a Ponzi scheme.

On the oth­er hand, if you stick a met­al pin through your cheek with­out suf­fer­ing any ill ef­fects, that may ac­tu­ally say some­thing about your im­mune sys­tem, es­pe­cially if dis­in­fec­tion has­n’t been in­vented yet. Thus, it could be an hon­est sig­nal of health, if per­haps not of the sharpest mind.

Sla­womir Koziel of the Pol­ish Acad­e­my of Sci­ences’ In­sti­tute of An­thro­po­l­ogy in Wro­claw, Po­land, and col­leagues de­cid­ed to ex­plore wheth­er body-de­cor­ated peo­ple ac­tu­ally do have bet­ter health than aver­age.

They meas­ured lev­els of bodily sym­me­try in 200 peo­ple with and with­out tat­tooes and un­con­ven­tion­al pierc­ings. Many sci­en­tists con­sid­er such sym­me­try as an in­di­ca­tor of healthy de­vel­op­ment.

Sym­me­try was sig­nif­i­cantly high­er in the tat­tooed-and-pierced group, es­pe­cially in men, the re­search­ers found.

“High­er body sym­me­try of the men hav­ing tat­toos or pierc­ing in­di­cates that this type of body de­cora­t­ion in the West­ern so­ci­e­ty can be re­lat­ed to the hon­est sig­nal of bi­o­log­i­cal qual­ity only for men,” Koziel and col­leagues wrote, de­scrib­ing their find­ings in a pa­per slat­ed for pub­lica­t­ion in the re­search jour­nal Ev­o­lu­tion and Hu­man Be­hav­ior.

“Both tat­toos and pierc­ings can pre­s­ent health risks,” such as due to blood-borne dis­eases, they not­ed, and it’s the abil­ity to take such risks suc­cess­fully that of­fers the bi­o­log­i­cal sig­nal.

It has­n’t been clear to date why tat­tooes and pierc­ings are done, the re­search­ers said. Such de­cora­t­ions can mark mem­ber­ship in a group of some sort, yet of­ten only some group mem­bers opt for these badges of mem­ber­ship. One pos­si­ble ex­plana­t­ion was that peo­ple get tat­tooes and pierc­ings in or­der to dis­tract from some phys­i­cal short­com­ing, but the study re­sults seemed to con­tra­dict this view, Koziel and col­leagues re­marked.

They al­so found that among males in their stu­dy, the most com­mon tat­too loca­t­ions were arms and legs, where­as in fe­males it was back and stom­ach. Pierc­ing were most of­ten on the face (76 per­cent) of males and on the ab­do­men (46 per­cent) of fe­males.

Visit this page »

One Response to “Tattoos and Piercings May Advertise Good Health”

  1. 21

    Jan

    Mark Pajak

    OK, but surely for this to work we must know, or subconsciously know, how our immune system will fare against such bodily invasion – i.e. “I know I have a good immune system therefore I shall get a tattoo”. Or is the reverse true as well?: both people with good and people with bad immune systems get tattooed and piercings, those who survive get to reproduce. I suppose this works – you know you take a risk when you modify yourself, but if you think you are doing it for any reason other than to get laid you are just kidding youself right?

    ……time to get inked up!

What do you think?


RSS feed Twitter feed Newsletter